We have one more blocker bug (opened today): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448307
On 5 May 2017 at 15:31, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:39:58PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > >>> > <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Hi, > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Release 3.11 for gluster has been branched [1] and tagged [2]. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> We have ~4weeks to release of 3.11, and a week to backport > features that > >>> > >> slipped the branching date (May-5th). > >>> > >> > >>> > >> A tracker BZ [3] has been opened for *blockers* of 3.11 release. > Request > >>> > >> that any bug that is determined as a blocker for the release be > noted > >>> > as a > >>> > >> "blocks" against this bug. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> NOTE: Just a heads up, all bugs that are to be backported in the > next 4 > >>> > >> weeks need not be reflected against the blocker, *only* blocker > bugs > >>> > >> identified that should prevent the release, need to be tracked > against > >>> > this > >>> > >> tracker bug. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> We are not building beta1 packages, and will build out RC0 > packages once > >>> > >> we cross the backport dates. Hence, folks interested in testing > this > >>> > out can > >>> > >> either build from the code or wait for (about) a week longer for > the > >>> > >> packages (and initial release notes). > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Features tracked as slipped and expected to be backported by 5th > May > >>> > are, > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 1) [RFE] libfuse rebase to latest? #153 (@amar, @csaba) > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 2) SELinux support for Gluster Volumes #55 (@ndevos, @jiffin) > >>> > >> - Needs a +2 on https://review.gluster.org/13762 > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 3) Enhance handleops readdirplus operation to return handles > along with > >>> > >> dirents #174 (@skoduri) > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 4) Halo - Initial version (@pranith) > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > I merged the patch on master. Will send out the port on Thursday. > I have > >>> > to > >>> > > leave like right now to catch train and am on leave tomorrow, so > will be > >>> > > back on Thursday and get the port done. Will also try to get the > other > >>> > > patches fb guys mentioned post that preferably by 5th itself. > >>> > > >>> > Niels found that the HALO patch has pulled in a little bit of the > IPv6 > >>> > patch. This shouldn't have happened. > >>> > The IPv6 patch is currently stalled because it depends on an internal > >>> > FB library. The IPv6 bits that made it in pull this dependency. > >>> > This would have lead to a -2 on the HALO patch by me, but as I wasn't > >>> > aware of it, the patch was merged. > >>> > > >>> > The IPV6 changes are in rpcsvh.{c,h} and configure.ac, and don't > seem > >>> > to affect anything HALO. So they should be easily removable and > should > >>> > be removed. > >>> > > >>> > >>> As per the configure.ac the macro is enabled only when we are building > >>> gluster with "--with-fb-extras", which I don't think we do anywhere, so > >>> didn't think they are important at the moment. Sorry for the confusion > >>> caused because of this. Thanks to Kaushal for the patch. I will > backport > >>> that one as well when I do the 3.11 backport of HALO. So will wait for > the > >>> backport until Kaushal's patch is merged. > >> > >> Note that there have been disucssions about preventing special vendor > >> (Red Hat or Facebook) flags and naming. In that sense, --with-fb-extras > >> is not acceptible. Someone was interested in providing a "site.h" > >> configuration file that different vendors can use to fine-tune certain > >> things that are too detailed for ./configure options. > >> > >> We should remove the --with-fb-extras as well, specially because it is > >> not useful for anyone that does not have access to the forked fbtirpc > >> library. > >> > >> Kaushal mentioned he'll update the patch that removed the IPv6 default > >> define, to also remove the --with-fb-extras and related bits. > > > > The patch removing IPV6 and fbextras is at > > https://review.gluster.org/17174 waiting for regression tests to run. > > This has now passed its tests. I don't want to merge my own patch, so > I'd like it if someone can merge it. > > > > > I've merged the Selinux backports, https://review.gluster.org/17159 > > and https://review.gluster.org/17157 into release-3.11 > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Niels > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Thanks, > >>> > >> Kaushal, Shyam > >>> > >> > >>> > >> [1] 3.11 Branch: https://github.com/gluster/ > glusterfs/tree/release-3.11 > >>> > >> > >>> > >> [2] Tag for 3.11.0beta1 : > >>> > >> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.11.0beta1 > >>> > >> > >>> > >> [3] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers: > >>> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0 > >>> > >> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >> maintainers mailing list > >>> > >> maintain...@gluster.org > >>> > >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > Pranith > >>> > > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > >>> > > Gluster-devel mailing list > >>> > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > >>> > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Pranith > >> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> maintainers mailing list > >>> maintain...@gluster.org > >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >> > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel