On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Atin, > > I had a look at "tests/basic/afr/gfid-mismatch-resolution-with-fav- > child-policy.t". > The test case passes in my local system with latest master. I also tried > cherry picking some of the patches which failed regression but it passed on > my system. > In the list https://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failure/214 many of the > patches passed this test case in the later phase and are already merged on > master. > > For many patches the test case failed for first time and passed when it > tried for second time. > In some cases it failed with EIO while doing "ls" for the file, but the > immediate "cat" on the file passed. > It has some dependency on the cli option to resolve gfid split-brain, > which is under progress. > So as discussed with Ravi, we were planning to mark it as bad at the > moment. Is that fine? > I'd suggest that and would request to mark it bad asap. It's been failing very frequently now. > Regards, > Karthik > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Refer https://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1 . tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self >> -heal.t >> <http://git.gluster.org/cgit/glusterfs.git/tree/tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t> >> is the 2nd in the list. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
