On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Krutika, > > tests/basis/stats-dump.t is failing all the time and as per my initial > analysis after https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17709/ got into the > mainline the failures are seen and reverting this patch makes the test to > run successfully. I do understand that the centos vote for this patch was > green but the last run was on 5th June which was 1 month back. So some > other changes have gone into in between which is now causing this patch to > break the test. > > This makes me think as a maintainer we do need to ensure the if the > regression vote on the patch is quite old, a rebase of the patch is must to > be on the safer side? > > Not sure if it is feasible. All we can do is, if its confirmed that a given patch is caused the issue, we should revert it (manually or automatically), and let the author/maintainer now about the revert. I guess it should be part of the work-flow so we don't have to bother about figuring out whose responsibility it is. Open to hear more suggestions here. -Amar > ~Atin > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
