I've retried it more than a couple of times and the failures are consistent.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Ashish Pandey <aspan...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi Nigel, >> >> As Pranith has already mentioned, we are getting different gfid's in loc >> and loc->inode. >> It looks like issue with DHT. If a re validate fails for gfid, a fresh >> look up should be done. >> >> I don't know if it is related or not but a similar bug was fixed by >> Pranith >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16986/ >> >> Ashish >> >> > Thanks for this info Ashish & Pranith. Also thanks for looking into this > Anoop. > > Nigel, lets retry these things, and see if its still the case! if not > great, but if it is, then I will help you sort this out! > > Regards, > Amar > > >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com> >> *To: *"Anoop C S" <anoo...@autistici.org> >> *Cc: *"gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:36:45 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes + >> Samba >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Anoop C S <anoo...@autistici.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:35 +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: >>> > Hi Pranith and Xavi, >>> > >>> > We seem to be running into a problem with glusto tests when we try to >>> run them against dispersed >>> > volumes over a CIFS mount[1]. >>> >>> Is this a new test case? If not was it running successfully before? >>> >>> > You can find the logs attached to the job [2]. >>> >>> VFS stat call failures are seen in Samba logs: >>> >>> [2017/06/29 11:01:55.959374, 0] ../source3/modules/vfs_gluster >>> fs.c:870(vfs_gluster_stat) >>> glfs_stat(.) failed: Invalid argument >>> >>> I could also see the following errors(repeatedly..) in glusterfs client >>> logs: >>> >>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031198] W [MSGID: 122019] >>> [ec-helpers.c:412:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0- >>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0: Mismatching GFID's in loc >>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031303] I [MSGID: 109094] >>> [dht-common.c:1016:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0- >>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-dht: Revalidate: subvolume >>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0 >>> for /user11 (gfid = 665c515b-3940-480f-af7c-6aaf37731eaa) returned -1 >>> [Invalid argument] >>> >> >> This log basically says that EC received loc which has different gfids in >> loc->inode->gfid and loc->gfid. >> >> >>> >>> > I've triggered a fresh job[3] to confirm that it only fails in these >>> particular conditions and >>> > certainly seems to be the case. The job is currently ongoing, so you >>> may want to take a look when >>> > you get some time how this job went. >>> > >>> > Let me know if you have any questions or need more debugging >>> information. >>> > >>> > [1]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/testReport/ >>> > [2]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/artifact/ >>> > [3]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/326/console >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Gluster-devel mailing list >>> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org >>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Pranith >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) > -- nigelb
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel