On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 02:00 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017, at 09:28 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: >> It appears that something changed in https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17771. >> The tarball with the logs for that patch was 32G. That doesn't sound right. >> Is something writing to log excessively after this patch landed?> > I don't see anything in the patch itself, or in its immediate predecessors, > that would account for this. However, it could be a less direct kind of > effect. I'll take a look. Are you sure that's the right patch? I looked at the smoke log, which seems quite ordinary, and the regression log is pretty tiny because tests on release-3.8-fb don't actually do much. On the other hand, I don't see any other patches on my list that seem to be likely culprits either.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
