On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Nigel Babu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Landed:https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/ > c3d7974e2be68f0fac8f54c9557d0f868e6be6c8 > > Please rebase your patches and re-trigger. > Thanks Nigel. I am wondering how did the build for #18681 succeed? Any insights on this? > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Nigel Babu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rafi has a fix[1]. I'm going to make it skip regressions and land it >> directly. >> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18680/ >> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Please check [1]. >>> >>> Build on master branch on my laptop failed too: >>> >>> [raghu@unused server]$ make > /dev/null >>> server.c: In function 'init': >>> server.c:1205:9: error: too few arguments to function >>> 'rpcsvc_program_register' >>> In file included from server.h:17:0, >>> from server.c:16: >>> ../../../../rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc.h:426:1: note: declared here >>> make[1]: *** [server.lo] Error 1 >>> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >>> >>> The change was introduced by [2]. However, the puzzling thing is [2] >>> itself was built successfully and has passed all tests. Wondering how did >>> that happen. >>> >>> [1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/7281/console >>> [2] review.gluster.org/18681 >>> >>> regards, >>> Raghavendra >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> nigelb >> > > > > -- > nigelb > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Raghavendra G
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
