On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed > > details for 3.10.11 > > > > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018 > > Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns, > > 1) Reviews, > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/ > - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/ > > Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or > smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail. > > @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them. > > 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing > consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a > look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective. > atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61 Author: Amar Tumballi <ama...@redhat.com> Date: Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530 tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926 BUG: 1517961 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <ama...@redhat.com> FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master. Should we mark it bad in release-3.12 as well? > > Tracker bug for blockers: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11 > > > > Shyam > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel