Thanks for this Poornima, Niels, The patch is now merged in wireshark project. If one of you post here once the release is made there, it would be great for Gluster Developers to upgrade.
-Amar On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Amar Tumballi <[email protected]> wrote: > Took a look at the patch! > > Looks like you have covered every FOP, other than compound? (which is not > used anywhere now). Is there anything specific which you missed, where you > need help to complete it? > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is the patch for dissecting Gluster 4.0 protocol in wireshark [1]. >> The initial tests for fops seem to be working. Request you all to add >> missing fops, fix/report any issues in decoding. >> >> [1] https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/28871 >> >> Regards, >> Poornima >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts) > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
