Hi Jiffin, No vendor will support your corosync/pacemaker stack if you do not have proper fencing. As Gluster is already a cluster of its own, it makes sense to control everything from there.
Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn May 3, 2019 09:08, Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 30/04/19 6:59 PM, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm posting this again as it got bounced. > > Keep in mind that corosync/pacemaker is hard for proper setup by new > > admins/users. > > > > I'm still trying to remediate the effects of poor configuration at work. > > Also, storhaug is nice for hyperconverged setups where the host is not only > > hosting bricks, but other workloads. > > Corosync/pacemaker require proper fencing to be setup and most of the > > stonith resources 'shoot the other node in the head'. > > I would be happy to see an easy to deploy (let say > > 'cluster.enable-ha-ganesha true') and gluster to be bringing up the > > Floating IPs and taking care of the NFS locks, so no disruption will be > > felt by the clients. > > > It do take care those, but need to follow certain prerequisite, but > please fencing won't configured for this setup. May we think about in > future. > > -- > > Jiffin > > > > > Still, this will be a lot of work to achieve. > > > > Best Regards, > > Strahil Nikolov > > > > On Apr 30, 2019 15:19, Jim Kinney <jim.kin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1! > >> I'm using nfs-ganesha in my next upgrade so my client systems can use NFS > >> instead of fuse mounts. Having an integrated, designed in process to > >> coordinate multiple nodes into an HA cluster will very welcome. > >> > >> On April 30, 2019 3:20:11 AM EDT, Jiffin Tony Thottan > >> <jthot...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Some of you folks may be familiar with HA solution provided for > >>> nfs-ganesha by gluster using pacemaker and corosync. > >>> > >>> That feature was removed in glusterfs 3.10 in favour for common HA > >>> project "Storhaug". Even Storhaug was not progressed > >>> > >>> much from last two years and current development is in halt state, hence > >>> planning to restore old HA ganesha solution back > >>> > >>> to gluster code repository with some improvement and targetting for next > >>> gluster release 7. > >>> > >>> I have opened up an issue [1] with details and posted initial set of > >>>patches [2] > >>> > >>> Please share your thoughts on the same > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Jiffin > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663 > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/topic:rfc-663+(status:open+OR+status:merged) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. All tyopes are thumb related > >> and reflect authenticity. > > Keep in mind that corosync/pacemaker is hard for proper setup by new > > admins/users. > > > > I'm still trying to remediate the effects of poor configuration at work. > > Also, storhaug is nice for hyperconverged setups where the host is not only > > hosting bricks, but other workloads. > > Corosync/pacemaker require proper fencing to be setup and most of the > > stonith resources 'shoot the other node in the head'. > > I would be happy to see an easy to deploy (let say > > 'cluster.enable-ha-ganesha true') and gluster to be bringing up the > > Floating IPs and taking care of the NFS locks, so no disruption will be > > felt by the clients. > > > > Still, this will be a lot of work to achieve. > > > > Best Regards, > > Strahil NikolovOn Apr 30, 2019 15:19, Jim Kinney <jim.kin...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> +1! > >> I'm using nfs-ganesha in my next upgrade so my client systems can use NFS > >> instead of fuse mounts. Having an integrated, designed in process to > >> coordinate multiple nodes into an HA cluster will very welcome. > >> > >> On April 30, 2019 3:20:11 AM EDT, Jiffin Tony Thottan > >> <jthot...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Some of you folks may be familiar with HA solution provided for > >>> nfs-ganesha by gluster using pacemaker and corosync. > >>> > >>> That feature was removed in glusterfs 3.10 in favour for common HA > >>> project "Storhaug". Even Storhaug was not progressed > >>> > >>> much from last two years and current development is in halt state, hence > >>> planning to restore old HA ganesha solution back > >>> > >>> to gluster code repository with some improvement and targetting for next > >>> gluster release 7. > >>> > >>> I have opened up an issue [1] with details and posted initial set of > >>> patches [2] > >>> > >>> Please share your thoughts on the same > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Jiffin > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/663 > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/topic:rfc-663+(status:open+OR+status:merged) > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. All tyopes are thumb related > >> and reflect authenticity. _______________________________________________ Community Meeting Calendar: APAC Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 NA/EMEA Schedule - Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
