Hi JR, Currently namespace is used for holding global view of whole volume. The only criteria of namespace would be requirement of inodes. if your namespace can provide enough inode count for all your data, that should be sufficient.
(I use reiserfs for namespace, it handles small files (here 0byte) well, and fast, and namespace data is not at all critical as its just used as persistent cache). Regards, Amar On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:42 AM, jrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > In my testing of gluster I've just put my name space directory > (which I'm replicating with afr) on /. > > Is this standard practice? If not, are there any recommendations > for how large the volume should (as a fraction of expected data > size)? > > Thanks > JR > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage! _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
