Tejas N. Bhise wrote:
Thanks for your feedback on unfsd. We will have a look.
Thanks. The performance is similar between 2.0.9 without any performance translators and 3.0.2rc2 with io-cache+writebehind. Without any performance translators, 2.0.9 seems to be much more responsive.
How's the experience on 3.0.2rc1, performance wise, between a Gluster client and server using the native protocol ?
I haven't noticed any obvious difference in performance between 2.0.9 and 3.0.2rc2 on my shared root cluster (single process client/server for rootfs).
Did you see that worsen in comparison to 2.0.9 or improve compared to 2.0.9 ? Would be very interested to know.
No immediately obvious difference. Gordan _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
