Anand Avati <[email protected]> wrote:

> Your summary is accurate. Currently distribute assumes link(2)ability of
> non-directories to provide POSIX semantics that the destination path should
> always be accessible if a file already existed at the time of rename(2).

Is there a document about the design of rename over dht?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to