On Tuesday 2012-10-02 21:15, Anand Avati wrote: >On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > The "-nostartfiles" is a discouraged option and is documented to > potentially result in undesired behavior. > > >Can you provide some reference why it is discouraged? In "man gcc" I see the >-nostartfiles option without any such discouragement (gcc version 4.4.6 >20120305). Also "man dlopen" uses -nostartfiles in the example command line.
Ok so it was not the gcc manpage that spoke about the "discouraged" status, but it was dlopen.3 as of man-pages-3.41: """In case you need to avoid linking against the system startup files, this can be done by using the gcc(1) -nostartfiles command-line option. Using these routines, or the gcc -nostartfiles or -nostdlib options, is not recommended. Their use may result in undesired behavior, since the constructor/destructor routines will not be executed (unless special measures are taken).""" But gluster has not provided any reason to me to avoid linking against crt (the C standard library runtime), nor does the project have a reason to avoid linking against crt either. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
