Anand Avati <anand.av...@gmail.com> wrote: > Now you are showing a segfault backtrace from glusterd, while previously > (the "single thread" backtrace) was from glusterfsd. Are both having > problems?
As I said, it is unrelated: it appears just because I linked with -lefence. That bug is usually hidden but since it is there I suggest it could be fixed. I understand this is an off-by-one in an array allocation? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel