On 04/30/2013 10:41 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
On 04/30/2013 10:27 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
I did a quick scan of mem-pool.c but failed to notice anything
obvious. If you
happen to notice it again, it should be worth a patch.
Mem-pool does zero memory, but none of GF_CALLOC, GF_MALLOC, or
GF_REALLOC do. For example, GF_CALLOC just calls __gf_calloc which just
calls calloc.
??
from TFM:
The calloc() function allocates memory for an array of nmemb
elements of size bytes each and returns a pointer to the allocated
memory. The memory is set to zero.
Yes, but also from TFM:
>The malloc() function allocates size bytes and returns a pointer
to the
>allocated memory. The memory is not initialized.
Yes, but both Avati and I are referring to your statement that
GF_CALLOC/calloc do not zero the memory. See above.
--
Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
