On 16/08/2013, at 8:11 PM, Harshavardhana wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Justin Clift <jcl...@redhat.com> wrote: <snip> > As a separate project, any thoughts on us replacing the current CLI with > a new one, based upon having a more complete RESTful API + a new CLI that > does nothing but be an interface to it? > > In that case CLI can be completely re-written in python or any other > language. This would eventually bring in more contributors to the project.
That's a very good point. :) I'd only been thinking of it from the point of view of giving us a "full" RESTful API that's equivalent to the CLI. So people could do some very in depth automation and integration with it. But having the CLI as Python does sound like it would be much easier to develop + get contributors for too. Proposal for 3.6 maybe? :) + Justin -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
