Anand Avati <av...@gluster.org> wrote: > The context here is the POSIX-"like" style of API exposed by GFAPI, and not > dependent on what syscalls the platform provides.
Oh right, then there is no impact. > Good to know (separately) > that the *at() syscalls will be supported in NetBSD in sometime. We implemented them, but pulling up to netbsd-6 branch would be way too intrusive for a release branch. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
