----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbel...@redhat.com> > To: "Brad Childs" <b...@redhat.com>, gluster-devel@nongnu.org > Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 5:34:32 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Speed gains from libgfapi > > On 02/07/2014 05:43 AM, Brad Childs wrote: > > Has anyone gone from using FUSE to libgfapi? How much did performance > > increase/decrease? > > > > I'm working on some libgfapi code and it is slower then my FUSE based > > solution, so I suspect something is wrong. I would like to know what kind > > of speed increase others see so I know what to expect. > > > > > > What operations do you find to be slower in libgfapi than FUSE? > > -Vijay > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
Well I don't have specific operations-- I'm implementing JNI/Java bindings, and both reads/writes are slower than raw FUSE writes. My suspicion is its in the buffering/memory between java/C but I'm still investigating. Thanks for the response i'll keep you updated! -bc _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
