Emmanuel,
I tried re-creating the issue, the memory accounting based testing did not
reveal much. Then I shifted to valgrind based testing but for some reason the
mount just hung and mount was disconnecting from bricks. I was doing the test
on local machine. Let me shift the testing to a proper cluster and post the
results.
Pranith
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <m...@netbsd.org>
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com>
> Cc: gluster-devel@nongnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:38:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs-3.5.0beta4 released
>
> Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it the same download and compile bsd test?
>
> Yes. Download and untar did not eat too much memory. Building for hours
> causes a
> lot if inflation. glustefsd new grew beyond 1 GB.
>
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
> 14076 root 43 0 1195M 68M parked/0 267:03 5.03% 5.03% glusterfsd
> 16500 root 42 0 1452M 75M parked/0 279:13 3.22% 3.22% glusterfsd
>
> --
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
> m...@netbsd.org
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
