On 15/04/2014, at 6:46 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: <snip> > I do not think holding 3.5.0 back for documentation backlog that has not been > covered earlier is right. I certainly think that there's no one stroke of the > brush that can fix all our documentation limitations. Given that we have > adequate information available (in some form) for features in 3.5, I am still > inclined to move these bugs as blockers for 3.5.1 and go ahead with 3.5.0 as > it exists today.
Where's the pressure coming from to release 3.5.0 without basic user documentation for all features? Is there _actual pressure_ from a defined source (who I can speak to), or is it something such as "we're really overdue already", etc? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
