Le lundi 31 août 2015 à 16:52 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le lundi 31 août 2015 à 12:15 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit : > >> The community moved off the .com names, to the .org names long ago (I > >> think it's been over 4 years now). > >> > >> But we've still people using these two domains. People should have > >> moved onto the .org names by now, but are still using these because > >> instead of redirecting, these have A records setup to point to the > >> respective servers, so the users never get to know. > >> > >> Using the .com domains also cause problems with Github OAuth login for > >> Gerrit. The login has been setup for the .org address and it doesn't > >> work correctly with .com names. > >> > >> If retiring these domains immediately seems harsh, we could instead > >> setup redirects to the .org alternatives. Additionally, we could also > >> setup up the redirect to use https instead of http as the default url. > >> > >> Anyone have thoughts on this? > > > > +1 on making a redirection and cname. I guess we can do some stuff httpd > > side to log who is using it, maybe trying to reach the users ( and fix > > our own scripts ), then announce we are breaking stuff, then breaking > > stuff ? > > If we have redirection setup using cname, we will not even hit httpd > with the old addresses. Also, when using cname, wouldn't the domain > name the users see still remain the old .com domains?
No. A cname wouldn't impact the http request, just the DNS. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
