Le samedi 27 février 2016 à 21:17 +0530, Raghavendra Talur a écrit : > On Feb 27, 2016 9:04 PM, "Amye Scavarda" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" <[email protected]> > > >>> > > > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look > at > > >>> > it. > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > > >> > > >> > > >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. > > > > > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding > misc > > > hoping to catch his attention. > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? > (When > > >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) > > >> > > >> > > >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in > > >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put > across > > >> pros and cons for that. > > >> Personally, > > >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 > > >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do > so with > > >> our current setup.) > > >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we > mean > > >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) > > >> > > >> > > >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in > > >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> Kaleb > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Gluster-infra mailing list > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-infra mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > > > Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday. > > > > In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented > > infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so > > that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the > > challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting > > people to volunteer to assist is not helpful. > > > > The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way > > do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em > > coming. > > +1 to everything. > > Update : the site is working now. Not sure about who fixed it or what fixed > it.
I did, once someone mentioned this was not working on a place where I was looking (ie, the irc channel #gluster). It seems that indeed, after last power cut, I didn't rejoin #gluster-dev from my 2nd irc client. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
