On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:35:09PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Nigel Babu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Instead, I propose a small website that'll track failures week-on-week > > and > > > trends of various failures over time. If a particular failure has > > increased in > > > number over one week, we'll know something has gone wrong. > > > > > > What does everyone think of this before I actually go and write some > > code? > > > > Sounds like a jolly good thing to have. > > > > > > This seems to make sense. > For the moment, we can limit it to failure, but I can see a lot of use for > something like this in the future. > Will you add this, once you get it somewhere public, to your proposal for > Berlin or does that not make sense? > > - amye > >
I haven't figured out if it will be part of my existing proposal or a separate one. That's something I want to talk to Raghavendra and Poornima about first. Hopefully, I'll have a proof of concept by the time Berlin comes around. -- nigelb _______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
