https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757804
--- Comment #4 from M. Scherer <[email protected]> --- so maybe the problem is that since the code is using spinlock sometime (but not always), and spinlock by nature would be a empty loop, then it might explain for that specific case why it do run more often than the rest of the function. Since that's a macro expanded to multiline code, I guess lcov/gcov might get confused by the fact that some part of the code is running more than the others, or something like that. There is a option on gcov for that (-a), but not in lcov. But again, that would matter only if we were looking at doing something with that precise info, no ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
