My thinking is both on the client so:
I AFR my nodes.
I then DHT my AFR bricks.
I then mount the DHT vols.
Or would I get better performance the other way around?
________________________________
From: Kirby Zhou [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 14 July 2009 17:51
To: Hiren Joshi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Gluster-users] DHT with AFR
Which do you want to get? AFR based on DHT or DHT based on AFR?
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hiren Joshi
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Gluster-users] DHT with AFR
Hi all,
I'm looking to create a system where all nodes are mirrored with
at least one other node (using afr) but I also want it to be fully
scalable (that is to say I can add another mirrored pair at any point to
the system).
Will AFR with DHT do what I want? Are there any problems/caveats
with this setup that I should know about? What have been your
experiences?
Thanks,
Josh.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
