One idea , docs said that you should create new directory. Could you create a new directory after add another server and copy files from old directory to new one, then everything will be distributed.
I know that glusterfs do not have reallocation mechanism for distribute data to new added bricks for achive performance and capcity problem. *Now the question is what about adding a new server? Currently hash works based on directory level distribution. i.e, a given file's parent directory will have information of how the hash numbers are mapped to subvolumes. So, adding new node doesn't disturb any current setup as the files/dirs present already have its information preserved. Whatever new directory gets created, will start considering new volume for scheduling files. Regards Vahric -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Rabben Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 6:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Gluster-users] Adding bricks to DHT Hi I have a GlusterFS DHT system that I need to expand in a few days. Reading up on the documentation it seems to me that adding bricks won't solve our problem because of how the hash works. I have a fairly static folder structure, but the number of files are growing fast. From what I understand, adding bricks will not allow new files to be stored on the new bricks unless they are stored in new directories. So my questions are: 1. How can I make sure the new bricks are used? 2. Is there a way to "rebalance" content over the new and old bricks? I can't tolerate much downtime on my FS. I am using GlusterFS 2.06. Regards Roland Rabben _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
