I am not sure about the number of threads I should use. Your arguement sounds logical and I should try that.
First of all I care about NOT loosing files. That's why I replicate files. I am not familiar with LVM and how to use it. Is this a normal setup for Gluster users? What are the pros and cons with LVM in a Glusterfs setup? Is it possible to create logical volumes from disks already containing data, or would they need to be formatted? They are formatted EXT3 today. Regards Roland Rabben 2010/7/19 pkoelle <[email protected]>: > Am 19.07.2010 17:10, schrieb Roland Rabben: >> >> I did try that on one of the clients. I removed all performance >> translators except io-threads. No imporovement. >> The server still use a hughe ammount of CPU. > > 36*8 = 288 threads alone for IO. I don't know specifics about GlusterFS but > common knowledge suggests high thread counts are bad. You end up using all > your CPU waiting for locks and in context switches. > > Why do you export each disk seperately? You don't seem to care about disk > failure so you could put all disks in one LVM VG and export LVs from that. > > cheers > Paul > >> >> Roland >> >> 2010/7/19 Andre Felipe Machado<[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hello, >>> Did you try to minimize or even NOT use any cache? >>> With so many nodes, the cache coherency between them may had become an >>> issue... >>> Regards. >>> Andre Felipe Machado >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>> >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Roland Rabben Founder & CEO Jotta AS Cell: +47 90 85 85 39 Phone: +47 21 04 29 00 Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
