Thanx, James! Is there any solution for such kind of problems? I do not like idea to have 4 connections to each server from each client in each DC instead of this scheme.
5 октября 2010 г. 17:12 пользователь Burnash, James <jburn...@knight.com>написал: > Hi Alex - Доброе утро (по крайней мере здесь) > > The problem with replication on both the server and the client is that the > server does not (I believe) have an awareness of what the client is doing. I > did post a thread asking about best practices for replication (I was leaning > towards server side to keep that traffic local), and was told that client > side replication was recommended and supported. > > I think you're seeing corruption on your copies because both the client and > the server are replicating. > > Also - the reason you didn't get an email directly from me last time was > that I only send to the list unless requested otherwise. I'm copying you > directly this time. > > Thanks, > > James Burnash, Unix Engineering > > -- когда я опустился на самое дно, снизу мне постучали..
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
