hi vidya,

thanks very much for this very comprehensive summary.  it's most reassuring
to read - this is exactly what the community needs.  looking forward to
further reports and releases...

regards,

paul


On 15 June 2011 14:57, Vidya Sakar <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> A couple of weeks back I had sought inputs from you all on 3.2.0 and I had
> committed to revert back with an action plan to address all
> concerns/suggestions.
>
> As you would have noticed, 3.2.1 was released a few days ago - already
> addressing some of your concerns. Please keep the feedback coming, inputs
> from the community are very important to us. Please find below responses to
> each of your concerns / suggestions :
>  *
> **1) Stability : *(Paul simpson, James Burnash, Mohit Anchlia)
>
> This is of utmost importance to us. We are investing more in QA engineers,
> QA lead and also in engineers who will dedicatedly work only on bug fixes.
> We are refining our development processes focusing more on quality and
> stability. We are increasing the test coverage and automating the tests
> along with more investments in lab infrastructure.
>
> *2) Better way to handle errors and failures, better troubleshooting tools
> : *(James Burnash, Whit Blauvelt)
>
> The scale of the number of components and systems involved increases the
> need for better troubleshooting tools and better handling of errors and
> failures. The recently introduced top/profile is a step in this direction to
> build diagnosability in to the product. There was also an effort on
> improving log messages in all modules – to make them more meaningful,
> prioritizing them appropriately, introducing new logs where necessary and
> things like that. The recently completed enhancements around logging in
> 3.2.0 is only the first of a multi-phase effort to improve logging and make
> the user experience much better.
>
> *3) **Better documentation :* (Udo Waechter, Christian Kauhaus)
>
>  We are revamping the documentation and we should soon have more content
> in existing sections and we will also have new content – things like
> troubleshooting section, performance tuning section, best practices section
> are all in the pipeline. The format of documentation is also due for a
> change shortly.
>
> *4) **P**osix compatibility :* (Paul simpson, Udo Waechter)
>
> We are fully committed to POSIX compatibility. Scenarios where it is not
> compatible if any would be high priority bugs for us.
>
> *5) **Better self-heal / reporting on which files are not replicated :*(Paul 
> simpson, Whit Blauvelt)
>
> This is already in our roadmap for 3.3. It is actively being worked on and
> we can soon expect improvements in this area.
>
> *6) **NFS nlm locking :* (Paul simpson)
>
> We do realize the need for NLM, I will get back to you all shortly on what
> our plan on NLM is going to be.
>
> *7) **Ability to list config settings **(including **default**)** /
> Performance settings and benchmarks : *(Mike Hanby, Udo Waechter)
>
> The list of defaults is given in this blog post :
> http://sacurs.blogspot.com/2011/05/glusterfs-defaults.html
>
>  And we also have a bug for this :
> http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2041
> *
> 8) Bugs : *(Mohit Anchlia, Udo Waechter)
>
> 1) gfid mismatch issue : Is this bug 2522? Please let me know if you are
> referring to something else
>
> 2) 0 byte file size : Bug 2922, we are working on it
>
> 3) Multiple files of same name showing up on the clent side : This problem
> too will get addressed as part of fixing 2522.
>
> 4) client hangs and crash : There are some related bugs which we fixed in
> 3.2.1, if this issue still persists, we are committed to fix the remaining
> issues.
>
> 5) xattr mismatch on gluster mount points causing split brain errors : This
> issue too is fixed in 3.2.1.
>
> 6) non-root owned files not shown : Bug 3030 has been filed to track this.
>
> Thanks,
> VS
>
> --
> Vidya Sakar N
> Senior Engineering Manager
> Gluster Software India (P) Ltd
> Bangalore
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Inputs
> requested on 3.2.0  Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:38:30 +0530  From: Vidya
> Sakar <[email protected]> <[email protected]>  To: [email protected]
>
> Thanks to everyone for all the inputs. I will get back with responses to
> each of your suggestions shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> VS
>
> --
> Vidya Sakar N
> Senior Engineering Manager
> Gluster Software India (P) Ltd
> Bangalore
>
>
> On Wednesday 25 May 2011 10:54 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> > Hi Vidya,
> >
> > Thanks for asking. I think it will be worthwhile to look at the
> > archives and mailing list to see what other people have reported for
> > 3.2. Few people already downgraded so not sure if they filed a bug.
> > But things that I have heard here:
> >
> > 1) gfid mismatch issue. Bug was filed
> > 2) 0 byte file size. Bug was filed
> > 3) Multiple files of same name showing up on the clent side
> > 4) client hangs and crash
> > 5) xattr mismatch on gluster mount points causing split brain errors.
> > Bug was filed
> >
> > I certainly want to use 3.2 for geo-rep feature but problems that I am
> > seeing that others have faced has put me back and waiting for 3.2 to
> > become more stable. It will be really good to make 3.2 really solid
> > and stable.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Udo Waechter
> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> for us, gluster 3.2.0 really messed up everything in a 
> >> distribute/replicate setup. Everything should be mentioned in this thread. 
> >> http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2011-May/007705.html
> >>
> >> The most important features for us would be:
> >> 1. 100% posix compatibility (this is already mentioned as a feature in the 
> >> FAQ!!!)
> >> 2. Better documentation. All the options and their settings do not really 
> >> explain what they do.
> >>   I could guess that performance.cache-size somehow influences 
> >> performance, but for us changing it to very high (4Gbs and more) and very 
> >> low (128Mb) did not change a thing. Same for stat-prefetch (which is 
> >> supposed to makels quickier) on/off: nothing. Would be nice to see some 
> >> scenarios/settingsand their benchmarks.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the effort,
> >> udo.
> >>
> >> On 24.05.2011, at 12:52, Vidya Sakar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> We are planing a 3.2.1 release and we would like to hear from you all on 
> >>> the specific concerns you may have about 3.2.0 stability and any bugs 
> >>> that you are hitting in 3.2.0 (if they already have not been filed yet). 
> >>> Inputs on 3.1.x is welcome too, please be specific on the information you 
> >>> provide us. Community feedback is of paramount importance to us, please 
> >>> file bugsto help us address them soon.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> VS
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Vidya Sakar N
> >>> Senior Engineering Manager
> >>> Gluster Software India (P) Ltd
> >>> Bangalore
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gluster-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> :: udo waechter - [email protected] :: N 52º16'30.5" E 8º3'10.1"
> >> :: genuine input for your ears: http://auriculabovinari.de
> >> ::                          your eyes: http://ezag.zoide.net
> >> ::                          your brain: http://zoide.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing 
> [email protected]http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to