Jeff,
On 03-Oct-2011, at 7:28 PM, Jeff White <[email protected]> wrote: > Amar, > > Is that patch related to my bug at > http://bugs.gluster.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 for what may be the same > rebalance problem described here? If so I might be able to test it today. Yes. It is the same bug. regards. > Jeff White > Linux/Unix Systems Engineer > University of Pittsburgh - CSSD > [email protected] > > On 10/03/2011 12:16 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: >> >> > >> > Is this a known bug, and is there a work-around? If not, is it safe to >> > delete the .*.gfs* files so I can at least use the volume? >> >> I have had the same exact behaviour with the latest package, on Ubuntu >> 11.0. The log shows a file size error after rebalance; while both file >> are identical. I presume that may be due to some caching done in the >> OS and the new file is not yet properly fulshed when it is being >> stat'ed for it's size. >> >> >> A patch is sent to remove the temporary file if any error happens while >> copying the data. (ref: http://review.gluster.com/552) >> >> Mean time, if you send me the exact log of 'rebalance process' (found at >> /var/log/glusterfs/etc-glusterd-mount-<volname>.log) it will help to corner >> the issue faster. Anyways, We will look into possibilities of the >> mismatching file size errors. >> >> Regards, >> Amar > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
