----- Original Message ----- > On 20 Jan 2012, at 14:08, RDP wrote:
> > Any inputs will be highly appreciated. > > My experience with gluster is that it's dismally slow for > applications like this. Given the information posted, I'm not sure I see that. If it were dynamic content with random I/O and lots of mixed reads and writes, I would agree with you. But because we're talking about static content and a read-heavy context, I'm thinking GlusterFS would actually be useful. -JM _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
