Thanks for the zippy reply, Brian. There seems to be a typo in your example - what does 'chmod foo/bar' supposed to do?
But even if that's the case, and the dir is not 'destroyed'. Perhaps 'made unusable' is a better description. Is this the intended effect? I assume not, but what could lead to it? Or rather why should trying to mount a gluster volume lead to that effect? hjm On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:05:25 Brian Candler wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Harry Mangalam wrote: > > Previous email had a typo in Subject line. > > What do you mean by "destroying" the mountpoint? > > I have seen those d??????????? entries before (not with gluster). > IIRC it's when a directory has 'read' but not 'execute' bits set. > > $ mkdir foo > $ chmod foo/bar > $ chmod 666 foo > $ ls -l foo > ls: cannot access foo/bar: Permission denied > total 0 > -????????? ? ? ? ? ? bar -- Harry Mangalam - Research Computing, OIT, Rm 225 MSTB, UC Irvine [ZOT 2225] / 92697 Google Voice Multiplexer: (949) 478-4487 415 South Circle View Dr, Irvine, CA, 92697 [shipping] MSTB Lat/Long: (33.642025,-117.844414) (paste into Google Maps) --
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
