seems like 'posix locking = no' helps
but that would be totally opposite to what gluster
documentation says and what samba manual suggests "....
Default: posix locking = yes .... You should never need to
disable this parameter.."
I wonder whether it posses any kind of negative
implications? Have you noticed/experienced any side effects?
On 26/03/12 12:36, Daniel Müller wrote:
Try:
[share]
comment = share on glusterfs brick
path = /mnt/glusterfs/windows/wingroup/share
posix locking =NO
readonly=no
valid users = @"Domain Admins" @shareusergroup
directory mask=2770
force directory mode=2770
create mask = 2770
force create mode=2770
force security mode=2770
force directory security mode=2770
force group = shareusergroup
browseable = no
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: [email protected]
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von lejeczek
Gesendet: Montag, 26. März 2012 13:28
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster as a storage backend to samba
actually I get "locking problem" very frequently, even if only copying files
from samba/gluster net share,
is there a fix/solution for these problems?
On 26/03/12 12:14, lejeczek wrote:
dear all,
how does as in the subject work,
I can see users run into number of different troubles, like here:
http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2011-February/006603.html
has anybody got it worked out? m$ office stuff, does it work with gluster?
cheers
Pawel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
