I am not aware of a mechanism where you can force a read from only one brick, but write to both, short of having reads done out of a totally separate directory structure.
Someone can correct me if this is wrong, but that is how my replica configuration behaves w/ 3.2.5. David On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:24 AM, François Legal wrote: > Hello, > > > This is my first post to the list. > > > I have 2 distant sites linked through a 10MBits MPLS. > > To improve user experience, we would like to setup a replicated glusterfs on > the 2 sites, such that a user on site A would access the files from site A > replicated server, and a user on site B would access the files from site B > replicated server. > > So I was thinking of a dual server setup, each being client and server for > its site, so that read access to files would be fast, and write access would > be as fast as MPLS allows it to be. > > The files would then be shared using samba to the users. > > > In this situation, I don't know if I should prefer client side AFR or server > side AFR (I guess server side AFR would make the files on both sites > unavailable if MPLS fails). > > > Anyway, I gave a test drive on this, and seem to be having locking issues > (users on both side can modify the same file without anything preventing > this). > > > Can anybody comment on this. > > > Thanks in advance. > > > François > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
