On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:25:30PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > I'm also considering no raid at all. > > For example, with 2 server and 8 SATA disk each, I can create a single > XFS filesystem for every disk and then creating a replicated bricks for > each. > > For example: > > server1:brick1 => server2:brick1 > > server1:brick2 => server2:brick2 > > and so on. > > After that, I can use these bricks to create a distributed volume. > > In case of a disk failure, I have to heal only on disk at time and not > the whole volume, right?
Yes. I considered that too. What you have to weigh it up against is the management overhead: - recognising a failed disk - replacing a failed disk (which involves creating a new XFS filesystem and mounting it at the right place) - forcing a self-heal Whereas detecting a failed RAID disk is straightforward, and so is swapping it out. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
