Shishir,
Thank you for getting back to me.
I have confirmed gNFS servers work fine with only two packages in my
environment.
# rpm -ivh --nodeps glusterfs-3.3.0-1.x86_64.rpm
glusterfs-server-3.3.0-1.x86_64.rpm
Note: rpm -ivh fails without --nodeps option.
Thanks,
Tomo
(2012/06/28 14:22), Shishir Gowda wrote:
Hi Tomo,
That is correct. These are harmless, and if you still want to migrate these
issues, then use the force option.
With regards,
Shishir
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomoaki Sato" <[email protected]>
To: "Shishir Gowda" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], "Amar Tumballi" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:23:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster-fuse and rebalance (Re: (3.1.X) add-brick
during re-balancing)
Shishir,
Thank you for providing the requested information.
I saw non-zero 'failures' count in output of 'gluster volume rebalance <volume>
status' and saw following log massages.
Let me confirm that these are harmless.
/var/log/glusterfs/vol1-rebalance.log:[2012-06-28 12:49:06.381196] W
[dht-rebalance.c:353:__dht_check_free_space] 0-vol1-dht: data movement
attempted from node (vol1-client-0) with higher disk space to a node
(vol1-client-2) with lesser disk space (/dir1/file-1)
Regards,
Tomo
(2012/06/28 13:29), Shishir Gowda wrote:
Hi Tomo,
gluster volume rebalance will re-distribute data only when the destination
server/brick has higher available space (also taking into account the file to
be migrated) than the source server/brick. This is done to maintain a balance
across the bricks/servers.
A force option would bypass this check, and would migrate the file as long as
the destination has enough space to accommodate the new file.
With regards,
shishir
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomoaki Sato" <[email protected]>
To: "Shishir Gowda" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], "Amar Tumballi" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:33:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster-fuse and rebalance (Re: (3.1.X) add-brick
during re-balancing)
Shishir,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
When should I specify 'force' option for 'gluster volume reparance <volume>
start' ?
-- excerpt from manual page --
8.5.2. Rebalancing Volume to Fix Layout and Migrate Data
After expanding or shrinking a volume (using the add-brick and remove-brick
commands respectively),
you need to rebalance the data among the servers.
To rebalance a volume to fix layout and migrate the existing data
• Start the rebalance operation on any one of the server using the following
command:
# gluster volume rebalance VOLNAME start
For example:
# gluster volume rebalance test-volume start
Starting rebalancing on volume test-volume has been successful
• Start the migration operation forcefully on any one of the server using the
following command:
# gluster volume rebalance VOLNAME start force
For example:
# gluster volume rebalance test-volume start force
Starting rebalancing on volume test-volume has been successful
-- --
Regards,
Tomo
(2012/06/27 17:32), Shishir Gowda wrote:
Hi Tomo,
That is correct. The gluster volume rebalance is no more dependent on
gluster-fuse package.
With regards,
Shishir
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomoaki Sato" <[email protected]>
To: "Amar Tumballi" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:36:44 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] gluster-fuse and rebalance (Re: (3.1.X) add-brick
during re-balancing)
Amar,
Let me confirm that gluster-fuse package is not required in NFS-server-use of
GlusterFS-3.3.0 as 'glaster volume rebalance' dose not use FUSE.
Regards,
Tomo
(2011/08/29 15:09), Amar Tumballi wrote:
1. fuse module is required to 'glaster volume rebalance'.
2. 'gluster volume rebalance start' and 'gluster volume rebalance stop'
must be issued in exactly same node.
By the way, why multiple re-balancing on a volume can be exist in a
cluster ?
Enhancement to make sure 'rebalance' operation co-operate with other peers is
in progress, and will be available in 3.3.0 release. For now, yes, there is a
possibility that single volume can have multiple rebalance operations going on
(on different machines). Even though it should not break any thing, it will
degrade the performance. For now, preventing this should be taken care by admin.
Regards,
Amar
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
