Hello Avati,
Thanks for your quick response. I had planned to upgrade to 3.3 at some
point, mainly to take advantage of the NFS memory leak fix.
I am worried about upgrading after bad experiences with 3.1.0 and
3.2.0. Does anyone have any experience of upgrading from 3.2.6 to 3.3.0?
-Dan.
On 07/16/2012 08:21 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
There were a lot of changes in NFS filehandle management in 3.3.0. Can
you check if these performance issue has been addressed with those
changes?
Avati
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dan Bretherton
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Dear All,
I am having a lot of trouble accessing GlusterFS 3.2.6 volumes
from Solaris 10 NFS clients. Volumes can be mounted but I/O
performance is so poor that the volumes are practically unusable.
Doing cd or ls can take a very long time and often hangs, with
repeated errors like the following.
mars etc # cd /users/rle
NFS server glusterfs not responding still trying
NFS server glusterfs ok
I am using the mount options recommended in the GlusterFS 3.2
Administration Guide. I also tried adding mount options
rsize=32768,wsize=32768 but it didn't seem to make any difference.
These are fixed mounts; automount doesn't work at all with
GlusterFS volumes on Solaris 10. I have no performance problems
with my Linux NFS clients. Can anyone suggest a way to improve
GlusterFS access from Solaris 10?
Regards,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
