On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:20:42PM -0400, Kushnir, Michael (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C] wrote: > I am thinking of a scenario where a brick #2 in two-brick a replica set > goes down and then comes back up. It will be inconsistent with brick > #1. From what I understand, missing and changed files are not > replicated until a user reads or writes to those files.
Not true as of gluster 3.3. There is now a self-heal daemon which kicks in automatically. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
