I've built gluster systems that did the internal stuff over an IB network and did the external stuff over 10G..
I didn't even think about it and it just worked. On Dec 18, 2012, at 11:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > I have an idea I'd like to run past everyone. Every gluster peer would have > two NICs - one "public" and the other "private" with different IP subnets. > The idea that I am proposing would be to have every gluster peer have all > private peer addresses in /etc/hosts, but the public addresses would be in > DNS. Clients would use DNS. > > The goal is to have all peer-to-peer communication (self-heal, rebalance, > etc) happen on the private network, leaving all the bandwidth on the public > network available for client connections. > > Will this work on 3.3.1 or newer? If the volume information that gluster > clients and servers pass to each other only has hostnames, I would expect it > to work. Of course I would have the usual scalability problems associated > with relying in part on /etc/hosts, but knowing that in advance, we can take > the proper precautions. > > Side note: the public and private NICs would each actually be a bonded pair > and plugged into separate switches for network redundancy. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
