I didn't think his message violated any of your rules. Seems to me he
has some disagreements with the approach being used to develop Gluster.
I think you should listen to people who disagree with you.
From monitoring this list for more than a year and
tried--unsuccessfully--to put Gluster into production use, I think there
are a lot of people who have problems with stability.
So please, can you respond to his comments with why his suggestions are
invalid?
sean
On 12/27/2012 03:39 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
Stephan,
I'm going to make this as simple as possible. Every message to this
list should follow these rules:
1. be helpful
2. be constructive
3. be respectful
I will not tolerate ranting that serves no purpose. If your message
doesn't follow any of the rules above, then you shouldn't be posting it.
This is your 2nd warning.
-JM
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Sean Fulton
GCN Publishing, Inc.
Internet Design, Development and Consulting For Today's Media Companies
http://www.gcnpublishing.com
(203) 665-6211, x203
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
