On 02/19/13 01:10, ruben malchow wrote:
i thought i could achieve this by doing striping. in this scenarion, i would do
stripe+replicate, with nodes 1-5 acting as
a stripe set and nodes 6-10 acting as it's replica.
with this setup, i would expect something in the range of 300-500MByte/s … but
actually, i see something in the range
of 100-200.
i assume that i am doing something wrong - either in the way i deal with block
sizes and/or with the way i try to use read-ahead.
i was hoping read-ahead could be configured to start preparing the next stripe
while the first one is reading and so on
as a remedy for latency issues - is this correct?
Striping isn't what you think it is...
http://joejulian.name/blog/should-i-use-stripe-on-glusterfs/
--
Mr. Flibble
King of the Potato People
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
