Hi Thomos,
It was a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874554 and its
fixed now.
-Varun Shastry
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 12:18 AM, Thomas Wakefield wrote:
Was there ever a solution for setting min-free-disk? I have a cluster of about
30 bricks, some are 8TB and new bricks are 50TB. I should be able to set
gluster to leave 500GB free on each brick. But one of the 8TB bricks keeps
filling up with new data.
This is my current setting:
cluster.min-free-disk: 500GB
Thoughts?
Running 3.3.1.
-Tom
On Aug 26, 2012, at 2:15 AM, James Kahn <[email protected]> wrote:
Further to my last email, I've been trying to find out why GlusterFS is
favouring one brick over another. In pretty much all of my tests gluster
is favouring the MOST full brick to write to. This is not a good thing
when the most full brick has less than 200GB free and I need to write a
huge file to it.
I've set cluster.min-free-disk on the volume, and it doesn't seem to have
an effect. At all. I've tried setting it to 25%, and 400GB. When I run
tests from an NFS client, they get written to the most full brick. There
is less than 10% free on that brick so it should be ignore with the
defaults anyway.
Any ideas?
JK
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
