Or they've turned off dir_index on the ext4filesystems. 

--
Michael Brown | `One of the main causes of the fall of
Systems Consultant | the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero,
Net Direct Inc. | they had no way to indicate successful
☎: +1 519 883 1172 x5106 | termination of their C programs.' - Firth
From: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 09:57
To: Kushnir, Michael (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C]
Reply To: Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ext4 compatibility

On 07/01/2013 09:48 AM, Kushnir, Michael (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C] wrote:
> I've run across several users on IRC and the mailing list using GlusterFS with Ext4.
>
> Is Ext4 compatibility fixed in 3.3.1-15 kkeithley RPMS, or are these users using a different version of GlusterFS?
>

No, the fix isn't in the 3.3.1-x community RPMs. The fix is in 3.4.0
(currently in beta) and IIRC will be in 3.3.2 when that's released.

People using ext4 are using glusterfs on systems with kernels before
2.6.32-267 or 3.2.9. For more info see
http://joejulian.name/blog/glusterfs-bit-by-ext4-structure-change/

--

Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to