On 07/10/2013 09:20 AM, Allan Latham wrote:
Where do I get a version that will solve my 'read local if we have the
file here' problem.

I would say 3.4 is already far better than 3.3 not only in terms of features but stability/maintainability/etc. as well, even though it's technically not out of beta yet. You can get it here:

http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0beta4/

Selection of the local subvolume (if there is one) should happen automatically, and multiple users have reported that this is in fact the case. You can also use the read-subvolume-index option to gain explicit control over this decision at mount time (via the --xlator-option hook).

My use case is exactly two servers at a server farm with 100Mbit between
them. This 100Mbit is also shared with the outside internet. Hence the
need to minimise use of this very limited resource.

That's very similar to the use case for the person who submitted the read-subvolume-index patch.

We are still in evaluation. Current 'best' is what we are familiar with
= unison and inotify. I don't like it because it's really only a hack.
However it works. If inotify misses a change due to race conditions
unison gets run every five minutes anyway.

If you're running with that level of eventual consistency already, might geo-replication be a better fit for your needs? It's a separate feature from normal (synchronous) replication, described in section 8 of the 3.3 admin guide.

http://www.gluster.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Gluster_File_System-3.3.0-Administration_Guide-en-US.pdf

Unfortunately, I can't find the 3.4 admin guide on the Gluster site (another pet peeve) or I'd provide a link to that.


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to