Log files sent privately to Joe.  If others from the community want to look at 
them, I’m OK with posting them here.  I don’t think they have anything 
confidential.  Now that I know about that 42 second timeout, the behavior makes 
more sense.   Why 42?   What’s special about 42?   Is there a way I adjust that 
down for my application to, say, 1 or 2  seconds?


-          Greg

From: Joe Julian [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 4:28 PM
To: Greg Scott; '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] One node goes offline, the other node can't see 
the replicated volume anymore

Huh.. this was in my sent folder... let's try again.

There's something missing from this picture. The logs show that the client is 
connecting to both servers, but it only shows the disconnection from one and 
claims that it's not connected to any bricks after that.

Here's the data I'd like to have you generate:

unmount the clients
gluster volume set firewall-scripts diagnostics.client-log-level DEBUG
gluster volume set firewall-scripts diagnostics.brick-log-level DEBUG
systemctl stop glusterd.service
truncate the client, glusterd, and server logs
systemctl start glusterd
mount /firewall-scripts
Do your iptables disconnect
telnet $this_host_ip 24007 # report whether or not it establishes a connection
ls /firewall-scripts
wait 42 seconds
ls /firewall-scripts
Remove the iptables rule
ls /firewall-scripts
tar up the logs and email them to me.

You can reset the log-level:

gluster volume reset firewall-scripts diagnostics.client-log-level
gluster volume reset firewall-scripts diagnostics.brick-log-level

lastly, do you have a loopback interface (lo) on 127.0.0.1 and is localhost 
defined in /etc/hosts?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to