Just a new warnning in nfs.log :
[2013-09-05 08:01:49.672997] W [nfs3.c:3550:nfs3svc_rmdir_cbk] 0-nfs:
62a72ff0: /vm-stripe2 => -1 (Directory not empty)


2013/9/5 higkoohk <[email protected]>

> Oh , you reminded me. Thanks !
>
> The really cause maybe the striped.
>
> After some test , I confirm that Esxi cann't use Striped-Replicate volume
> on Glusterfs's nfs.
> But could success on Distributed-Replicate .
>
> Do you know how or why ?
>
>
> 2013/9/5 Anand Avati <[email protected]>
>
>> That's odd, because IIRC Esxi does not even use NLM protocol..
>>
>> Avati
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:44 PM, higkoohk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Vijay !
>>>
>>> It run success after 'volume set images-stripe nfs.nlm off'.
>>>
>>> Now I can use Esxi with Glusterfs's nfs export .
>>>
>>> Many thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/5 Anand Avati <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> This looks like it might be because you need -
>>>>
>>>> http://review.gluster.org/4591
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you can confirm, we can backport it to 3.4.1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Avati
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Vijay Bellur <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  On 09/05/2013 04:55 AM, higkoohk wrote:
>>>>> > yes,I'm using GlusterFS 3.4.0
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you try by turning off acl with nfs. Some performance numbers have
>>>>> been better with acl turned off. This can be done through:
>>>>>
>>>>> volume set <volname> nfs.acl off
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is no improvement, opening a bug and attaching gluster logs to
>>>>> that would be useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Vijay
>>>>>
>>>>> > 在 2013-9-5 上午3:12,"Vijay Bellur" <[email protected]
>>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>>写道:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     On 09/04/2013 08:38 AM, higkoohk wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         Hello everyone:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >               When I use esxi mount nfs storage to gluster, mount
>>>>> success!
>>>>> >               But , It is very very slowly when create vm, then
>>>>> failed !
>>>>> >               I can see the vm's dir and files create successed. but
>>>>> the
>>>>> >         size is
>>>>> >         zero.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >               Does anyone hit this ? What happened and how does me
>>>>> do ?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     Is this behavior being observed with GlusterFS 3.4.0?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     -Vijay
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to