On 10/29/2013 04:12 PM, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote:
On 10/28/13 23:34, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
The problem I am seeing is this. I am using hostnames to add peers
into the pool and the output of gluster peer status reflects this.
However, the output of the --remote-host peer status gives the name of
the current host in the form of an IP address. Why this discrepancy?
Was the current host the one you started the cluster from? (ie. you did
peer probe to the other hosts from the current one?)
If that is the case, this is a known issue. You just need to run peer
probe from a different peer back to the one in question. That will
correct the peer listing.
As for having the current host in the peer list, a host does not peer
itself, so the context would be incorrect to list it.
Though, if the current host was not a peer in the cluster, then it would
not list any other peers.
'gluster pool list' in 3.5 contains information about all nodes in the
cluster (including the host on which command is issued).
-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
