the change for the bug seems more reasonable, that get the ips for hostname in server side then comparet with the incoming client's ip. So, we don't need the DNS reverse lookup for the incoming client's IP. But the fix is well tested and ready to backport? <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915153>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:07 PM, shwetha <[email protected]> wrote: > Refer to bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915153 > > On 12/04/2013 11:11 AM, Cool wrote: > > Means you'd better use IP instead of host name, or you have to ask your > DNS administrator to setup reverse DNS (PTR record) for those IPs, which > may involve your upstream ISP, or even more complicated than that ... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup > > - C.B. > On 12/3/2013 9:24 PM, Mingfan Lu wrote: > > > host(a.b.c.d) I got, > Host a.b.c.d.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) > > a.b.c.d stands for the ip address of my client. > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Cool <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wild guess - >> >> How about DNS revert delegation? Try "host <IP>" to see if it can be >> mapped back to "hostname1" then there should be something wrong, otherwise >> you have DNS problem. >> >> -C.B. >> >> P.S. I guessed because I believe whenever a connection comes in, the >> server does not know anything other than IP and port. >> >> On 12/3/2013 8:38 PM, Mingfan Lu wrote: >> >> In the gluster nodes, I could ping the clients using the hostnames. So, >> DNS wouldn't be the root cause. >> the clients could also resolve the hostnames (ping is ok) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How is your DNS setting? >>> >>> Could your client resolve the hostname? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Mingfan Lu <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I tried to set auth.allow using hostnames (not IPs) of clients >>>> such as >>>> gluster volume set VOLUME auth.allow hostname1,hostname2,hostname3 >>>> >>>> But the clients could not mount the volume >>>> If I use IPs, it defintely works. >>>> But for my clients use DHCP, so I don't think using IPs is a good idea >>>> for they could be changed but hostnames of them wouldn't. >>>> >>>> Any comments? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing >> [email protected]http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> <http://www.avast.com/> >> >> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! >> Antivirus<http://www.avast.com/>protection is active. >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! > Antivirus<http://www.avast.com/>protection is active. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing > [email protected]http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
