Hi Nguyen, We also have fixed using 3.2.7 for production - it works well for us.
I was thinking to upgrade to 3.4.x in the next month or so. I'd like to understand more - how many people are actually using 3.4.1? Can anyone (users) or from gluster/redhat chime in here - would be reassuring to hear that the latest version is also the greatest.. Regards, Paul On 2 December 2013 15:52, Nguyen Viet Cuong <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Actually, I have very bad experience with GlusterFS 3.3.x and 3.4.x under > very high pressure (> 64 processes write in parallel in more than 10 > minutes, for example). GlusterFS 3.2.7 from EPEL is really stable and we > use it for production. > > Unfortunately, there is no official built of GlusterFS 3.2.x on Gluster's > repo. > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
