Elias, 
        Looks like you’ve got your replication setup turned around. The replica 
count is the number of times you want the data replicated across the volume. So 
right now, for every file you write, it is being written to 5 bricks, I would 
suspect you want more of a replica 2. You would modify your volume create 
command to look more like this

gluster vol create replica 2 server1:/gv0/vol1/data server2:/gv0/vol1/data 
server3:/gv0/vol1/data server4:/gv0/vol1/data server5:/gv0/vol1/data 
server1:/gv0/vol2/data server2:/gv0/vol2/data server3:/gv0/vol2/data 
server4:/gv0/vol2/data server5:/gv0/vol2/data

- Dean 




On Jan 22, 2014, at 11:33 PM, Elías David <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> The place I work for is starting to look at gluster to replace a current 
> windows share we have. The amount of files and sizes varies a lot, from very 
> small (~5kb) to somewhat large (~25GB).
> 
> Since we're checking if gluster is a viable option for us, and we're still 
> learning about the filesystem, we're pretty sure that a problem we're seeing 
> right now is coming from our ignorance.
> 
> Right now our biggest concern during our tests is a ridiculously low 
> performance, I'm talking about a 'cp -R /home/user/* /mnt/data' where 
> /mnt/data is: mount -t glusterfs 192.168.0.10:/VolName /mnt/data that took 
> something ridiculous like 12 "hours" or more to transfer mere 226GB of data 
> (from ISOs to documents to flat files....).
> 
> Right now our setup is this:
> -We have 5 servers (peers) with each having two 2TB disks WD black formatted 
> with xfs -i size=512, each disk is a brick so we have:
> 
> 192.168.0.10 disk0 (2TB) on /gv0/vol1
> 192.168.0.10 disk1 (2TB) on /gv0/vol2
> 192.168.0.11 disk0 (2TB) on /gv0/vol1
> 192.168.0.11 disk1 (2TB) on /gv0/vol2
> and so on...
> 
> Total: 2TB disk x 10 = 20TB
> 
> Now, not being really sure yet how replica counts really work, we created a 
> volume with "replica 5", as in:
> 
> gluster vol create replica 5 server1:/gv0/vol1/data server2:/gv0/vol1/data 
> server3:/gv0/vol1/data server4:/gv0/vol1/data server5:/gv0/vol1/data 
> server1:/gv0/vol2/data server2:/gv0/vol2/data server3:/gv0/vol2/data 
> server4:/gv0/vol2/data server5:/gv0/vol2/data
> 
> Vol info goes like this:
> 
> Volume Name: Data
> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> Volume ID: 2c938585-d2bd-43cf-98d8-caab70033750
> Status: Started
> Number of Bricks: 2 x 5 = 10
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: 192.168.0.10:/gv0/vol1/data
> Brick2: 192.168.0.11:/gv0/vol1/data
> Brick3: 192.168.0.12:/gv0/vol1/data
> Brick4: 192.168.0.13:/gv0/vol1/data
> Brick5: 192.168.0.14:/gv0/vol1/data
> Brick6: 192.168.0.10:/gv0/vol2/data
> Brick7: 192.168.0.11:/gv0/vol2/data
> Brick8: 192.168.0.12:/gv0/vol2/data
> Brick9: 192.168.0.13:/gv0/vol2/data
> Brick10: 192.168.0.14:/gv0/vol2/data
> 
> The servers are not bad really, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450  @ 3.00GHz 8 
> cores, 32 GB of ram and 1GB link for gluster
> 
> As I said earlier I mounted this vol on another machine in the lan using 
> 'mount -t glusterfs 192.168.0.10:/Data /mnt/data' and I use a simple cp -R to 
> put data on it, I also tested with 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data/zerofile 
> bs=1M count=50000' and this dd process is running four about 5 hours now and 
> I'm about to reach 24GB of 50GB file size...
> 
> I'm pretty sure that this problem is solely caused from our ignorance of the 
> filesystem and that's why I ask you guys
> 
> The servers are all running CentOS 6.5, glusterfs-* packages from EPEL repo, 
> glusterfs version 3.4.2
> 
> Another question I would like to add if I may is that, I run df -h after 
> mounting the volume and I'm seeing as total volume capacity of 3.7 terabytes 
> when I expected something like 10 terabytes given 10 2TB disks in a replica 5 
> setup, is this normal or I'm misunderstanding the replica count thing?
> 
> That's it, sorry for the long message just wanted to be clear, any input or 
> info about this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to